- 8 -
Rule 60, and to attach to the objection a copy of the trust
instrument or other documentation showing that the petition was
filed by a fiduciary legally entitled to institute a case on
behalf of Residential Management. The Court subsequently
extended the time within which the objection was to be filed.
D. Robert Hogue’s Objection
Ultimately, the Court received an objection, which was
signed by Robert Hogue, to respondent’s motion to dismiss.
Paragraph 5 of the objection states:
ROBERT HOGUE presented a Trust instrument for the court
which is a Contractual Contract Trust based on common
law & the United States Constitution, Article One,
Section 10., MR. HOGUE also presented notarized
documentation to the court to show his acceptance of
Trusteeship. As well as further documentation such as
form 56, Fiduciary Signature card showing Robert Hogue
as wet signature on bank account. At best this site is
frivolous and without merit. The court is trying to
mislead the petitioner in this court action. ROBERT
HOGUE is the only person who can represent the trust.
His description as Trustee for Residential Management
is well established in his everyday work as Trustee.
Attached to the objection are copies of, inter alia, another
five-page purported trust instrument dated May 24, 1994 (the
altered trust instrument) and documents entitled “Monthly
Management Meeting” (purported minutes).
The altered trust instrument, including the unnumbered cover
page and recordation information, is essentially identical to the
1994 trust instrument with the exception of the following:
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011