Dale A. Rinehart and Jeana L. Yeager, f.k.a. Jeana L. Rinehart, et al. - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          Tax Returns                                                                 
               Petitioners timely filed their tax returns for 1994, 1995,             
          and 1996.  Petitioners filed a joint return for 1994 and filed              
          separate returns claiming a filing status of single for 1995 and            
          1996.  Ms. Yeager listed her last name as “Yeager”, and not                 
          “Williams”, on her 1995 and 1996 returns.                                   
               Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for                
          1999.  On this return, Ms. Yeager listed her last name as                   
          “Rinehart”.                                                                 
               In January 2001, 1 month prior to the trial in this case,              
          Mr. Rinehart filed a Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income             
          Tax Return, for 1999 changing his filing status from Married                
          filing joint return to Single.  Ms. Yeager also filed an amended            
          return for 1999 claiming single status.  On the amended return,             
          Ms. Yeager listed her last name as “Yeager”.                                
                                       OPINION                                        
          I.   Marital Status                                                         
               A. Burden of Proof                                                     
               As a preliminary matter, petitioners argued that respondent            
          raised a new issue in the answer by asserting that petitioners              
          should be treated as married for their Federal income tax filing            
          status, and consequently respondent bears the burden of proof on            
          the issue of whether petitioners should be treated as married               
          during the years in issue.                                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011