John R. Rivera - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          administrative files relating to 1977 through 1984 had been                 
          destroyed.  Respondent’s counsel did not submit returns relating            
          to 1977 through 1988 or consent agreements (e.g., Form 870 or               
          Form 4549) relating to 1977 through 1983.                                   
               On March 11, 2002, respondent filed a motion to reopen                 
          record to introduce a certified copy of Form 870, Waiver of                 
          Restrictions on Assessment and Collection of Deficiency in Tax              
          and Acceptance of Overassessment (Form 870).  Form 870, signed by           
          petitioner on August 25, 1995, related to tax liabilities for               
          1984 and 1985 and estimated tax and civil fraud penalties                   
          relating to 1984 through 1988.  The Court, on April 12, 2002,               
          granted respondent’s motion to reopen record, and received the              
          Form 870 into evidence.                                                     
               On November 7, 2002, the Court held a telephone conference             
          with petitioner and respondent’s counsel and noted that there was           
          no evidence in the record indicating whether petitioner had filed           
          returns relating to 1977 through 1988.  On December 6, 2002,                
          respondent’s counsel, who had previously informed the Court that            
          the administrative files relating to 1977 through 1984 had been             
          destroyed, filed a status report stating that she was waiting to            
          receive the administrative files relating to 1977 through 1984              
          from respondent’s Service Center in Ogden, Utah.  In the status             
          report, respondent’s counsel also stated that, after trial, she             
          had observed revenue agent’s reports signed by petitioner in the            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011