- 10 - 1999, or 2000. Petitioner does not contend that she was not required to file tax returns for any of these years. We conclude that petitioner had not filed all required tax returns when she filed her offer in compromise. 2. Whether Respondent’s Refusal To Consider Petitioner’s Offer In Compromise Because Petitioner Had Not Filed All Required Tax Returns Was an Abuse of Discretion Petitioner contends that respondent’s refusal to consider her offer in compromise because she had not filed required income tax returns was unreasonable and thus an abuse of discretion. We disagree. Petitioner did not submit all of the financial information supporting her offer in compromise that was requested by Neighbor. The Commissioner will not process an offer that lacks sufficient information to permit the Commissioner to evaluate its acceptability. Sec. 301.7122-1T(c)(2), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 64 Fed. Reg. 39020 (July 21, 1999). Section 5.8.3.3(2) and (4) of the Internal Revenue Manual, promulgated on February 4, 2000, and in effect at all time relevant here, provides that the Commissioner may not process an offer in compromise if the taxpayer has not filed all required tax returns. 2 Administration, Internal Revenue Manual (CCH), sec. 5.8.3.3(2), (4), at 16,283. The Commissioner’s decision not to process an offer in compromise or a proposed collection alternative from taxpayers who have not filed all required taxPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011