- 7 - amounts reflected in the notice of deficiency. Respondent also concedes that the initial cost of goods sold that was disallowed in the notice of deficiency for 1995 should be reduced from $260,282 to $47,884. Respondent also concedes that petitioners are entitled to additional Schedule C expense deductions (in excess of what was initially reported by petitioners) in the amounts of $109,436, $104,690, and $12,155 for 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively. OPINION Stipulation of Facts In the stipulation of facts, petitioners conceded unreported gross receipts for each of the years in issue. In their brief, however, petitioners claim that they did not stipulate to these amounts and that respondent’s counsel told them they had to sign the stipulation prior to trial. Petitioners have not moved to be relieved from the stipulation or presented grounds that they should not be bound to their admissions. See Rule 91(e). We are not persuaded by petitioners’ argument and hold that the stipulation remains binding. Cost of Goods Sold Petitioners continue to dispute that respondent incorrectly disallowed $47,884 of petitioners’ claimed cost of goods sold for 1995. Respondent argues that petitioners have failed toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011