Frank R. Sanchez - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency of $2,019 and an addition           
          to tax of $504.75 pursuant to section 6651(a) in petitioner’s               
          Federal income tax for the taxable year 1995.                               
               This case was submitted fully stipulated pursuant to Rule              
          122.  The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                
          incorporated herein by this reference.  At the time the petition            
          was filed, petitioner lived in Long Beach, California.                      
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioner:  (1) Was not entitled to a claimed $23,039 net                  
          operating loss (NOL) deduction; (2) was not entitled to deduct a            
          total of $2,990 of subcontractor expense claimed on four separate           
          Schedules C, Profit or Loss From Business; (3) was entitled to a            
          $40 deduction in arriving at adjusted gross income for one-half             
          of the increased self-employment tax resulting from the                     
          disallowed Schedules C expenses; and (4) was subject to an                  
          addition to tax pursuant to section 6651(a) for failure to file             
          his 1995 tax return by the prescribed due date.                             
               Petitioner filed his petition with this Court requesting a             
          redetermination of the 1995 and 1987 tax years.  Respondent                 
          subsequently filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction             
          and Strike as to the Taxable Year 1987.  By order, on August 6,             
          2001, this Court granted respondent’s motion dismissing the 1987            
          taxable year for lack of jurisdiction because no notice of                  
          deficiency was issued for that taxable year.  However, the order            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011