David K. and Elizabeth Simpson - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          commencing April 20, 1997, through and including April 20, 2008,            
          were assigned to Singer.3  The assignment left the Simpson Trust            
          with the right to receive future annual lottery payments of                 
          $647,000 through the year 2008.  The right to receive the 2009,             
          2010, and 2011 payments was not assigned.                                   
               On June 2, 1998, Mr. Simpson, as trustee of the Simpson                
          Trust, entered into another assignment agreement with Singer.               
          Pursuant to this agreement, the right to receive the remaining              
          $647,000 of 10 annual lottery payments for the years 1999 through           
          2008 was assigned to Singer in exchange for a lump-sum payment of           
          $4,485,000.                                                                 
               At all relevant times, the laws of the State of California             
          precluded a lottery winner from assigning the right to receive              
          future annual lottery payments without obtaining California                 
          Superior Court approval.  On June 26, 1998, the Simpson Trust and           
          Singer filed with the California Superior Court for the County of           
          Sacramento (Sacramento County Superior Court) a joint petition              
          for an order approving voluntary assignment of lottery winnings.            
          On July 7, 1998, the Sacramento County Superior Court issued an             
          order approving the assignment.                                             
               Singer issued to Mr. Simpson a Form 1099-B, Proceeds From              
          Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions, for 1998.  The Form                


               3The evidence in the record does not reflect the                       
          consideration paid by Singer under this assignment agreement.               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011