Frederick Smith, Jr. and Vanessa Smith - Page 9




                                        - 8 -                                         
          forbearance of money.  Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 498                 
          (1940).                                                                     
               Whether a payment constitutes income when received depends             
          on the parties’ rights and obligations at the time that the                 
          payment was made.  Commissioner v. Indianapolis Power & Light               
          Co., 493 U.S. 203, 211 (1990).  Whether a payment is either                 
          includable in the gross income of the recipient or is not taxable           
          to the recipient (e.g., as a gift) must be reached on                       
          consideration of all factors.  See Commissioner v. Duberstein,              
          363 U.S. 278, 288, 292 (1960) (reversing Court of Appeals and               
          affirming the Tax Court, finding that a purported gift was a                
          recompense for past services or an inducement for the taxpayer to           
          be of further service in the future).                                       
               The payment lacks many of the traditional indicia of debt.             
          See Bergersen v. Commissioner, supra.  Petitioner and Ms. Johnson           
          did not execute a note.  As of the time of trial, petitioner had            
          not paid either principal or interest.  Repayment was due upon              
          demand by Ms. Johnson, but she had not demanded payment of either           
          principal or interest.  Petitioner lost contact with Ms. Johnson,           
          and petitioner was uncertain even how to locate Ms. Johnson at              
          the time of trial.                                                          
               The $32,500 payment is reflected in petitioners’ records as            
          an income item with two other items of income received from FSZ.            
          Petitioner failed to provide the Court with a reasonable                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011