Gloria J. Spurlock - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          $9,180 in 1997 from Ursuline and wages of $801 in 1995 and $1,335           
          in 1996 from The Louisville Orchestra (Orchestra); (3) she                  
          received taxable IRA distributions of $1,140 from Bank One                  
          Kentucky (Bank One) in 1995 and $10,750 from The Pioneer Group,             
          Inc. (Pioneer) in 1997.  Those determinations were made on the              
          basis of Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, Forms 1099-MISC,                
          Miscellaneous Income, and Forms 1099-R, Distributions from                  
          Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs,              
          Insurance Contracts, etc., that the various entities submitted.2            
               Ursuline prepared Forms W-2 stating it paid to petitioner              
          wages of $7,347.50 in 1995 and $9,180 in 1997.  Orchestra                   
          prepared Forms W-2 stating it paid to petitioner wages of $801 in           
          1995 and $1,335 in 1996.  Ursuline prepared Forms 1099 stating it           
          paid to petitioner nonemployee compensation of $7,515 in 1995 and           
          $20,542 in 1996.  Bank One prepared a Form 1099 stating it paid a           
          taxable IRA distribution of $1,140 to petitioner in 1995.                   
          Pioneer prepared a Form 1099 stating it paid a taxable IRA                  
          distribution of $10,750.40 to petitioner in 1997.  All the                  
          aforementioned amounts shown on the Forms W-2 were paid to                  
          petitioner as reported thereon.                                             


               2We point out that some of our findings of fact are made on            
          the basis of petitioner’s requested findings of fact to which               
          respondent did not object.  We note that she also objects to the            
          admission of certain records which support some of her requested            
          findings.  We have admitted those documents.  See infra pp. 8 to            
          16.                                                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011