Square D Company and Subsidiaries - Page 57

                                       - 36 -                                         
          placing an additional burden on the Retained Executives.  Despite           
          these challenges, petitioner met its business plan for 1992.                
          IV. Tax Returns, Notice of Deficiency, and Petition                         
               On its 1992 Federal income tax return, petitioner claimed a            
          deduction for $10,384,490 of the aggregate $15,867,291 in                   
          Retention Payments and 1991 SRP Benefits paid to the Retained               
          Executives in December 1992.  (See supra p. 31 table.)                      
          Petitioner concluded that the $5,482,801 balance of such payments           
          should be deferred under section 461(a) and (h) until economic              
          performance occurred in 1993, 1994, and 1995.  In a notice of               
          deficiency, respondent determined that $7,586,105 of the                    
          deduction claimed in 1992 should be disallowed as excess                    
          parachute payments under section 280G.                                      
               On its 1991 Federal income tax return, petitioner claimed a            
          deduction under section 162(a) for the $699,027 it paid to Rogers           
          & Wells for the firm’s services to Banque Paribas in connection             
          with the litigation surrounding the acquisition of petitioner by            
          Schneider.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined              
          that this deduction should be disallowed.                                   
               Petitioner did not claim a deduction on its 1991 return for            
          the $1,056,020 it paid to Schneider as reimbursement for                    
          Schneider’s 1991 payment of the loan commitment fees.  In an                
          amendment to its petition, petitioner asserted entitlement to a             
          deduction in 1991 for the foregoing amount.  In his answer to the           






Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011