- 107 - Unlike the decedent in Estate of Harper and other cases factually similar to that case, the record in the instant cases establishes that Mr. Stone and Ms. Stone did substantially more than “change the form in which he [and she] held his [and her] beneficial interest in the contributed property.” Estate of Harper v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-121. The record in the instant cases shows that the Five Partnerships had economic substance and operated as joint enterprises for profit through which the children actively participated in the management and development of the respective assets of such partnerships during their parents’ lives (and thereafter). When the partners of ES3LP formed and funded that partnership, they contemplated and intended that ES3LP operate as a joint enterprise for profit for the management of its assets and that the children contribute their services in providing such management. After ES3LP was funded in April 1997, the children actively managed the assets of that partnership, as Mr. Stone and Ms. Stone intended. When the partners of ES4LP formed and funded that partnership, they con- templated and intended that ES4LP operate as a joint enterprise for profit for the management of its assets and that Eugene Earle Stone, IV, contribute his services in providing such management. After the funding of ES4LP in April 1997, Eugene Earle Stone, IV, began actively managing the assets of ES4LP, as Mr. Stone and Ms. Stone intended. When the partners of CRSLP formed and fundedPage: Previous 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011