- 6 - tax return interest income arising from the sale of a business plan or intellectual property. Neither petitioners nor Navis reported on any Federal income tax return interest income arising from the sale of PowerAgent or WorkWorld. Petitioners claimed a bad debt deduction on Schedule C of their 1997 Federal income tax return. On Schedule C, Mr. Sundby indicated that his principal business was that of a lender, reporting income on the cash basis. Mr. Sundby also indicated that he did not “materially participate” in the operation of this business. Discussion Petitioners bear the burden of proving that they are entitled to their claimed bad debt deduction. Rule 142(a);4 INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992). To avail themselves of a bad debt deduction pursuant to section 166,5 4Sec. 7491 does not apply in the instant case to shift the burden of proof to respondent because petitioners neither alleged that sec. 7491 was applicable nor established that they fully complied with the requirements of sec. 7491(a)(2). 5Sec. 166. BAD DEBTS. (a) General Rule.-- (1) Wholly worthless debts.-–There shall be allowed as a deduction any debt which becomes worthless within the taxable year. (2) Partially worthless debts.-–When satisfied that a debt is recoverable only in part, the Secretary may allow such debt, in an amount not in excess of the (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011