Sunshine Residential Trust, Robert Hogue, Trustee - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
               ROBERT HOGUE presented a Trust instrument for the court                
               which is a Contractual Contract Trust based on common                  
               law & the United States Constitution, Article One,                     
               Section 10., MR. HOGUE also presented notarized                        
               documentation to the court to show his acceptance of                   
               Trusteeship.  As well as further documentation such as                 
               form 56, Fiduciary Signature card showing Robert Hogue                 
               as wet signature on bank account.  At best this site is                
               frivolous and without merit.  The court is trying to                   
               mislead the petitioner in this court action.  ROBERT                   
               HOGUE is the only person who can represent the trust.                  
               His description as Trustee for Sunshine Residential                    
               Trust is well established in his everyday work as                      
               Trustee.                                                               
               Attached to the objection are copies of, inter alia, a                 
          purported trust instrument dated August 15, 1996, and a document            
          entitled “Trustee Resignation/Appointment of Successor-Trustee”             
          dated July 15, 1997 (appointment document).5                                
               The purported trust instrument provides, in pertinent part,            
          as follows:                                                                 




               5  The same purported trust instrument and appointment                 
          document were both submitted to the Court by Robert Hogue in                
          Sunshine Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9117-00, involving the           
          1996 tax year, which was dismissed on the ground that Robert                
          Hogue was not a proper person authorized to petition the Court on           
          behalf of the trust.  Likewise, with the exception of the name of           
          the so-called trust, the appointment document is identical to the           
          appointment document submitted to the Court by Robert Hogue in              
          numerous cases before this Court that were dismissed on the                 
          ground that Robert Hogue was not a proper person authorized to              
          petition the Court on behalf of the “trust”.  See Rancho                    
          Residential Facility Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9120-00;             
          Residential Mgmt. Servs. Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9119-            
          00; Home Health Servs. Trust v. Commissioner, docket No. 9118-00;           
          Sunshine Trust v. Commissioner, supra; Residential Mgmt. Servs.             
          Trust v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-297; cases cited supra               
          n.2.                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011