Superior Proside, Inc. - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
          under the usual common law rules applicable in determining the              
          employer-employee relationship, as an employee or as an                     
          independent contractor (or other individual who is not an                   
          employee).”  Petitioner apparently believes that the purported              
          lack of common law control makes its treatment of Murdock                   
          reasonable within the meaning of Section 530 and that the above             
          definition supports this view.                                              
               Again, however, petitioner’s approach is contrary to                   
          controlling statutes and to the facts of this case.  As a matter            
          of construction, Section 530(c)(2) defines employment status for            
          purposes of certain provisions of Section 530 not germane here.             
          It does not purport to override or interpret the definition of              
          “employee” in section 3121(d) and related regulations.  Hence,              
          Section 530(c)(2) does not render it rational for petitioner to             
          have ignored the statutory mandate regarding corporate officers             
          and to have taken a position that was not otherwise supported by            
          authority.  Petitioner also does not claim in actuality to have             
          relied on Section 530(c)(2) in deciding not to treat Murdock as             
          an employee in 1995, 1996, or 1997.  We conclude and have found             
          as a fact that petitioner did not have a reasonable basis for               
          failing to characterize Murdock as an employee.  Consequently,              
          relief from employment tax liability is not available to                    
          petitioner under Section 530.                                               








Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011