Norman J. Suter - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the           
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                  
               Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner’s Federal             
          income taxes of $6,752 and $675 for the taxable years 1997 and              
          1998.  The issue for decision is whether petitioner is entitled             
          to disallowed deductions claimed as business supplies expense.1             
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in               
          Matthews, North Carolina, on the date the petition was filed in             
          this case.                                                                  
               During the years in issue, petitioner worked as an                     
          independent contractor for Imperial Construction, Inc., and was             
          paid commissions for the jobs he completed.  He filed a Schedule            
          C, Profit or Loss From Business, in each year in issue, claiming            
          deductions for supplies expense of $26,250 in 1997 and $3,588 in            
          1998.  In the statutory notice of deficiency, respondent                    
          disallowed $19,441 and $2,655 of these deductions, respectively.            
               A taxpayer may deduct the ordinary and necessary expenses              
          paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on a trade             
          or business.  Sec. 162(a).  A taxpayer, however, generally must             
          keep records sufficient to establish the amounts of the items               


          1The remaining adjustments in the statutory notice of                       
          deficiency are computational and will be resolved by the Court’s            
          holding on the issue in this case.                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011