William A. Swann and Judith A. Swann - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          Collection Due Process Hearing (Form 12153), and requested a                
          hearing with respondent’s Appeals Office (Appeals Office).                  
          Petitioners attached a document to their Form 12153 (petitioners’           
          attachment to Form 12153) that contained statements, contentions,           
          arguments, and requests that the Court finds to be frivolous                
          and/or groundless.4                                                         
               On March 12, 2002, a settlement officer with the Appeals               
          Office (settlement officer) held an Appeals Office hearing with             
          petitioners with respect to the notice of intent to levy.  At the           
          Appeals Office hearing, the settlement officer gave petitioners a           
          literal transcript of account (so-called MFTRAX) with respect to            
          their taxable year 1998.                                                    
               On April 17, 2002, the Appeals Office issued to petitioners            
          a notice of determination concerning collection action(s) under             
          section 6320 and/or 6330 (notice of determination).  An attach-             
          ment to the notice of determination stated in pertinent part:               
               Verification of Legal and Procedural Requirements                      
               The Secretary has provided sufficient verification that                
               all legal and procedural requirements have been met.                   
               Computer transcripts have been reviewed by Appeals,                    
               verifying the assessments.                                             


               4Petitioners’ attachment to Form 12153 contained statements,           
          contentions, arguments, and requests that are very similar to the           
          statements, contentions, arguments, and requests contained in the           
          attachments to Forms 12153 filed with the Internal Revenue                  
          Service by certain other taxpayers with cases in the Court.  See,           
          e.g., Copeland v. Commissioner, supra; Smith v. Commissioner,               
          supra.                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011