Paul S. and Sharon E. Talchik - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

               On Schedule D of their 1999 return, petitioners reported               
          $47,555 in short-term capital gains.  That amount was offset,               
          however, by a short-term capital loss carryover from 1998 of                
          $74,836, leaving a $27,281 net short-term capital loss carryover            
          to future years.                                                            
               Petitioners also reported long-term capital gains of $29,535           
          during 1999 that were also totally offset by a long-term capital            
          loss carryover from 1998 of $99,122.  This left petitioners with            
          a $69,587 long-term capital loss carryover to future years.                 
               Petitioners reported dividend and interest income of $225 on           
          their 1999 return.  Additionally, petitioners reported on a                 
          Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, net income of $17,569,            
          of which $17,428 came from the rental of a commercial building at           
          Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, and $141 from an apartment partnership.            
               Respondent determined that $47,555 of the investment                   
          interest deduction claimed by petitioners was not deductible as             
          investment interest under section 163(d).  The $225 amount that             
          was allowed by respondent represented the equivalent interest and           
          dividend income reported by petitioners that respondent agreed              
          represented investment income and, thus, entitled petitioners to            
          an itemized deduction for investment interest equal to the                  
          investment income they reported.  Sec. 163(d)(5)(A)(i), (d)(4),             
          (d)(1).  Respondent has not questioned petitioners' payment of              
          the $47,780 in interest; consequently, there is no substantiation           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011