Harvey Taylor - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          individuals who do not have any qualifying children, and whose              
          earned income is $9,770 or greater are not entitled to an earned            
          income credit for that year.  Sec. 32(a) and (b); Rev. Proc. 96-            
          59, 1996-2 C.B. 392.  An individual with qualifying children is             
          entitled to a credit at higher levels of earned income and in a             
          larger amount than is an individual without qualifying children.            
          Sec. 32(a) and (b).  As is relevant here, a qualifying child is a           
          child of a taxpayer who has the same principal place of abode as            
          the taxpayer for more than half of the taxable year.  Sec.                  
          32(c)(3)(A).                                                                
               Petitioner claimed the earned income credit with Tristan and           
          Harvey as qualifying children.  However, none of petitioner’s               
          children, including Tristan and Harvey, resided with petitioner             
          for any portion of 1997.  Petitioner therefore had no qualifying            
          children during that year.  See sec. 32(c)(3)(A)(ii).  Because              
          petitioner had no qualifying children, and because he had taxable           
          wages of $18,546 in 1997, petitioner is not entitled to an earned           
          income credit in any amount for that year.  Sec. 32(a) and (b);             
          Rev. Proc. 96-59, supra.                                                    
               Finally, we briefly address an argument made by petitioner             
          in his petition that, because he did not receive a refund of                
          Federal income taxes for 1997, “the IRS [should] go after the               
          person who got the refund.”  At trial, petitioner indicated that            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011