Harold Lee and Melissa Diane Thomas - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal             
          income tax of $939 for the taxable year 1998.                               
               The issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled             
          to a dependency exemption deduction and a child tax credit for a            
          son of petitioner husband (petitioner), Jonathan Lee Thomas                 
          (Jonathan).1                                                                
               Petitioners resided in Illinois on the date the petition was           
          filed in this case.                                                         
               Petitioner and his former wife, Jonnie Linda Thomas (Ms.               
          Thomas), were divorced pursuant to a Judgment of Dissolution of             
          Marriage of the Circuit Court, Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St.              
          Clair County, Illinois, dated October 3, 1988.  This judgment               
          provided in relevant part:                                                  
                    That the husband shall have the income tax deduction or           
               exemption for the minor child, Jonathon [sic] Thomas, and              
               the wife shall not claim said child on her tax returns so              
               long as the husband pays child support and is current                  
               thereon.                                                               
          During the entire year in issue, Jonathan resided with Ms. Thomas           
          in Rome, New York, and did not reside with petitioners.                     



          1Petitioners argue in the petition that the “IRS has                        
          exceeded its 3-year statutory period to process any claims.”                
          Petitioners did not address this issue at trial, and we therefore           
          consider it to have been abandoned.  However, we note that                  
          petitioners’ return for taxable year 1998 was filed on or about             
          April 8, 1999, the statutory notice of deficiency with respect              
          thereto was timely issued on February 1, 2002, and the petition             
          in this case was timely filed.  Thus, the 3-year period of                  
          limitations on assessment and collection has not expired.  Secs.            
          6213(a), 6501(a) and (b)(1), 6503(a)(1).                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011