Albert Dudley Thrower - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          illegal receipts for the first 8 months of 1988 as being 8 times            
          this amount.6                                                               
               If a taxpayer keeps inadequate records, the Commissioner may           
          compute the taxpayer’s income by any indirect method that is                
          reasonable in light of all the facts and circumstances.  See United         
          States v. Walton, 909 F.2d 915, 918 (6th Cir. 1990); see also United        
          States v. Fior D’Italia, Inc., 536 U.S. 238, 243 (2002) (stating            
          that IRS assessment authority under section 6201(a) is not exceeded         
          “when the IRS estimates an individual’s tax liability–-as long as           
          the method used to make the estimate is a ‘reasonable’ one”).  If           
          necessary, the Commissioner may reconstruct a taxpayer’s income,            
          provided the result is reasonable and substantially correct.                
          Mendelson v. Commissioner, 305 F.2d 519, 521-522 (7th Cir. 1962),           
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1961-319; Cebollero v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          1990-618, affd. 967 F.2d 986 (4th Cir. 1992).  The Commissioner’s           
          income reconstruction need not be exact, but it must be “reasonable         
          in light of all surrounding facts and circumstances.”  Schroeder v.         
          Commissioner, 40 T.C. 30, 33 (1963).                                        
               Respondent reconstructed petitioner’s alleged illegal income           
          using the projection method, which “has received widespread judicial        
          approval.”  Jackson v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 394, 403 (1979).  In           
          general, the projection method entails extrapolating income for a           

               6 In the notice of deficiency, respondent also allowed                 
          petitioner a $423,013 deduction for cost of goods sold relative             
          to the alleged illegal income.                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011