Frederick W. and Candace J. Tiley - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Section 215(a) allows a deduction for alimony paid during a            
          taxable year.  “Alimony” is defined in section 71(b) as a payment           
          if “the divorce or separation instrument does not designate such            
          payment as a payment which is not includible in gross income                
          under this section and not allowable as a deduction under section           
          215".  The settlement entered into by petitioner with his former            
          wife expressly stated that the payments agreed to would not be              
          income to Ms. Tiley and would not be deductible by petitioner.              
          Thus, the amount paid by petitioner to Ms. Tiley during 1998                
          clearly was not alimony deductible by petitioner.                           
               Section 6662 imposes a penalty in an amount equal to                   
          20 percent of the portion of an underpayment attributable, among            
          other things, to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.           
          “‘[N]egligence’ includes any failure to make a reasonable attempt           
          to comply with the provisions of * * * [Title 26], and the term             
          ‘disregard’ includes any careless, reckless, or intentional                 
          disregard.”  Sec. 6662(c).                                                  
               This case clearly justifies the penalty.  Petitioner                   
          expressly agreed in open court, in response to questions from his           
          counsel and from the court, that the amounts that he paid to                
          Ms. Tiley would not be deductible alimony.  He ignored that                 
          agreement and, instead, seeks to justify his deduction on the               
          basis of his preexisting liabilities that were reduced and                  
          liquidated in the settlement.  Even if we were to accept                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011