- 12 - purchaser makes a small cash payment and executes a nonrecourse note for the remaining purchase price. Id. In this type of situation, the transaction is so economically infeasible or lacking in economic substance that the investor’s primary or sole motivation for entering into the transaction is the tax benefits (e.g., artificially inflated depreciation deductions and investment tax credits). Id. The fair market value of the underlying asset will not conceivably support the purchase price, and the nonrecourse debt practically ensures that the price will not be paid. Id. For these reasons, prior opinions of this Court and of other courts have focused on fair market value of the property and the character of financing for purposes of evaluating profit objective. Id.; Rose v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 386, 412-414 (1987), affd. 868 F.2d 851 (6th Cir. 1989). Fair market value is the price that would be reached by a willing buyer and willing seller where neither is under any compulsion to buy or sell. Chiu v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 722, 730 (1985); Gianaris v. Commissioner, supra. Previous sales of the same property without subsequent events affecting value are generally strong indicators of fair market value. Tripp v. Commissioner, 337 F.2d 432, 434-435 (7th Cir. 1964), affg. T.C. Memo. 1963-244; Chiu v. Commissioner, supra at 734-735; Estate of Scull v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-211; Brigham v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-413.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011