Donald L. Walford - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         
          Horvey), a certified public accountant (C.P.A.).  Mr. Horvey has            
          a degree in accounting from Metropolitan State College of Denver            
          and has been a C.P.A. since 1984.  Mr. Horvey represents that he            
          is familiar with the cashflow analysis used by respondent and has           
          used that and similar analyses as part of his work over the                 
          years.                                                                      
               One of the stated purposes of Mr. Horvey’s report was to               
          provide an opinion as to the appropriate discount rate to be                
          applied to a present value analysis of an investment in an entity           
          such as Sav-Fuel.  Mr. Horvey felt that a profit-motivated                  
          investor participating in any type of speculative investment                
          would seek a risk-adjusted rate of return greater than the 11.5-            
          percent risk-free rate used in Gianaris.  In his opinion, a 15-             
          percent adjusted rate of return was reasonable if the required              
          risk adjustment was 125 percent of the risk-free rate of return.            
          However, Mr. Horvey provided separate calculations of net present           
          value using discount rates of 11.5 percent, 12 percent, 13                  
          percent, 14 percent, 15 percent, and 16 percent.                            
               Mr. Horvey’s calculation of net present value uses many of             
          the same figures and assumptions as the calculation contained in            
          the attached appendix.  However, Mr. Horvey carried the cashflow            
          analysis through June 30, 2030, the anticipated dissolution date            
          of Sav-Fuel.  As explained earlier, we have assumed consistent              
          with the PPM that the useful life of the EMS was 25 years.  The             






Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011