Water-Pure Systems, Inc. - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          because the copy of the 1998 return contained in the record does            
          not include the first two pages.)  For 1996, an attached                    
          Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, characterizes the                 
          foregoing amount as nonpassive income from Schedule K-1.  For               
          1997, $17,052.98 is shown on Schedule E as nonpassive income from           
          Schedules K-1; $6,000 is shown on Schedule E and on Form 4831,              
          Rental Income, as rent; and $16,500 is shown on Schedule C,                 
          Profit or Loss From Business, as gross receipts.  For 1998,                 
          $4,822.46 is shown on Schedule E as nonpassive income from                  
          Schedules K-1, $6,000 is shown on Schedule E and on Form 4831 as            
          rent, and $14,000 is shown on Schedule C as gross receipts.                 
          The Notice of Determination                                                 
               On June 8, 2001, respondent sent to petitioner the notice of           
          determination at issue in this proceeding.  The notice was based            
          on a determination that Ridge was to be legally classified as an            
          employee for purposes of Federal employment taxes and that                  
          petitioner was not entitled to relief from such classification              
          pursuant to Section 530.  Enclosed with the notice was a schedule           
          setting forth petitioner’s liabilities for FICA and FUTA taxes.             
               In calculating petitioner’s FICA and FUTA liabilities,                 
          respondent concluded that only Ridge (and not Mrs. Ridge)                   
          provided services to petitioner during the years in issue and,              
          accordingly, limited the computation to amounts distributed to              
          Ridge.  As a result, for each of the years 1996, 1997, and 1998,            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011