- 3 - Discussion Social Security benefits are subject to income tax treatment pursuant to section 86. The amount of such benefits to be included in gross income is subject to a statutory formula. See sec. 86(a) through (d). Section 86 requires inclusion of the payments if the sum of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income (with certain modifications not relevant here) and one-half of the Social Security benefits received, exceeds a specified “base amount”. Jelle v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 63, 71 (2001). This base amount is $25,000 for a taxpayer, like petitioner, who is not married and did not file a joint return. See sec. 86(c)(1). Since petitioner reported adjusted gross income of $29,278 and received Social Security benefits totaling $8,756 during the 2000 taxable year, the base amount threshold is clearly exceeded. We therefore sustain respondent’s determination that a portion of $8,756 petitioner received in 2000 as Social Security benefits must be included in petitioner’s gross income for that taxable year. We note that petitioner, like other taxpayers, has questioned the fairness of section 86. See, e.g., McAdams v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 373, 379 (2002). However, “No scheme of taxation, whether the tax is imposed on property, income, or purchases of goods and services, has yet been devised which is free of all discriminatory impact.” San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 41 (1973). And this Court hasPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011