Jimmy D. and Marlene M. Morloc Weaver - Page 9

                                                - 9 -                                                   

                        includible in the gross income of the persons                                   
                        participating in the plan.                                                      
                  The facts at hand establish as to Clarkston’s service                                 
            agreement with J.D. a method or arrangement that “has the effect                            
            of a * * * plan deferring the receipt of compensation” by a                                 
            nonemployee so as to subject Clarkston’s deduction of the fees                              
            for J.D.’s services to the timing rule of section 404(d).  Sec.                             
            404(a), (b)(1)(B), (d).  Section 404(d) sweeps broadly to apply                             
            to all compensation plans, methods, or arrangements                                         
            (collectively, arrangements), however denominated, which in                                 
            substance defer the receipt of compensation by a service                                    
            provider.  Sec. 1.404(b)-1T, Q&A-1, Temporary Income Tax Regs.,                             
            51 Fed. Reg. 4321 (Feb. 4, 1986); sec. 1.404(d)-1T, Temporary                               
            Income Tax Regs., 51 Fed. Reg. 4322 (Feb. 4, 1986); see also Avon                           
            Prods., Inc. v. United States, 97 F.3d 1435 (Fed. Cir. 1996);                               
            Truck & Equip. Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 141, 145-154                                  
            (1992).3  An arrangement defers the receipt of compensation if                              

            3 We also note that the legislative history of sec. 404(a),                                 
            (b), and (d) supports our construction of that section.  That                               
            history is generally discussed in detail in Avon Prods., Inc. v.                            
            United States, 97 F.3d 1435, 1439-1442 (Fed. Cir. 1996), and                                
            Truck & Equip. Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 141, 145-154                                  
            (1992).  We stress that the House Committee on Ways and Means, in                           
            describing a 1984 amendment to sec. 404(b), stated that:                                    
                  Generally, all compensation arrangements which defer                                  
                  receipt of compensation by the employee or independent                                
                  contractor will be subject to these special                                           
                  deduction-timing rules.  For example, under the bill, a                               
                                                                          (continued...)                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011