Ronald D. Weeldreyer and Suzanne Weeldreyer - Page 16

                                                - 16 -                                                  
            the participant has notice or knowledge of the plan.  Wigutow v.                            
            Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-620.                                                          
                  In the instant cases, a plan (as defined in section                                   
            1.105-5(a), Income Tax Regs.) existed.  Dreyer Farms adopted a                              
            written medical reimbursement plan identifying who was eligible                             
            to participate, what expenses would be reimbursed, and how                                  
            participants were to make claims for reimbursement.  The plan was                           
            adopted at the first meeting of the board of directors.                                     
                  Mr. Weeldreyer had knowledge of the medical reimbursement                             
            plan as well as the health insurance policy.  Moreover, there is                            
            no doubt that the medical reimbursements provided under the                                 
            written plan were intended to complement benefits provided by                               
            health insurance.  Thus, the corporation’s medical plan included                            
            health insurance as well as the medical reimbursements.  And                                
            finally, we are satisfied that the corporation’s medical plan was                           
            for Mr. Weeldreyer’s benefit as an employee of Dreyer Farms, and                            
            not for his benefit as one of the corporation’s shareholders.                               
                  Plans limited to employees who are also shareholders are not                          
            per se disqualified under section 105(b).  Larkin v.                                        
            Commissioner, supra at 635 n.5.  In this regard, we have                                    
            sustained plans for corporate officers who were also shareholders                           
            because those officers had central management roles in conducting                           
            the business of the corporation.  Wigutow v. Commissioner, supra;                           
            Epstein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1972-53; Seidel v.                                      






Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011