Linda M. Weiler, a.k.a. Linda M. Krupnick - Page 12

                                                - 12 -                                                  
            D.    Rule 155 Computation                                                                  
                  Where we file or state our opinion, we may withhold entry of                          
            decision for the purpose of permitting the parties to submit                                
            computations pursuant to our determination of the issues, showing                           
            the correct amount of deficiency, liability, or overpayment to be                           
            entered as the decision.  Rules 155(a), 320(a) (except as                                   
            otherwise provided, the other Rules of Practice and Procedure, to                           
            the extent pertinent, are applicable to actions for the                                     
            determination of relief from joint and several liability pursuant                           
            to section 6015).                                                                           
                  We recognize that the amount of relief from liability each                            
            petitioner is entitled to, and therefore each petitioner’s                                  
            ultimate liability, may be different under section 6015(b) and                              
            (c).  We leave it to the parties to compute the amount of relief                            
            from liability each petitioner is entitled to under section                                 
            6015(b) and (c).  Given the remedial nature of section 6015, we                             
            expect that the parties will submit the computation for an entry                            
            of a decision that is most beneficial to each petitioner (i.e.,                             
            the one that relieves each petitioner from the largest total                                
            amount).  See Cheshire v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 183, 188-189                               
            (2000), affd. 282 F.3d 326 (5th Cir. 2002); H. Conf. Rept. 105-                             
            599, at 249-255 (1998), 1998-3 C.B. 747, 1003-1009.                                         


                  8(...continued)                                                                       
            11 Fed. Appx. 701 (8th Cir. 2001).                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011