- 6 - reinstituted. At your due process hearing your representative discussed disposition of the liabilities through full payment or the possibility of making an Offer-in-Compromise. However, your representative was unable to provide a comprehensive accounting of your assets so that a determination might be made with regard to the necessity of full payment or the feasibility of an offer (nothing was presented upon which a legal sufficiency determination could be based), nor was an Offer-in-Compromise presented. The renegotiation and reinstatement of your installment agreement is not possible because of the pending assessments; your previous default; and, the amount of the required payments considering all unpaid balance of assessments will not pay the debt within the statute. OPINION At trial, petitioner stated the only relief he is seeking is a remand to the Appeals Office for further proceedings.3 Where the validity of the underlying tax liability is not properly in issue, we review respondent’s determination for an abuse of discretion. Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000). Petitioner testified that he suffered from a stroke in 1995 and hearing loss shortly thereafter. As of April 1999, petitioner began using hearing aids. By October 1999, petitioner felt the hearing aids were functioning well for him. In October 1999, petitioner was evaluated by Eugene H. Freed, M.D.4 Dr. Freed was an Agreed Medical Examiner, a 3 Petitioner’s underlying tax liability is not in issue. 4 Although the record is unclear, this examination appears to be part of petitioner’s litigation with Fujita Corp.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011