Olen W. and Gwendolyn Wilborn - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          Your Right to a Hearing Under IRC 6320 with respect to the 1996             
          and 1997 years.                                                             
               Petitioners then submitted a Form 12153, Request for a                 
          Collection Due Process Hearing, which was received by respondent            
          on April 27, 2001.  On the Form 12153 petitioners checked boxes             
          indicating disagreement with both a “Filed Notice of Federal Tax            
          Lien” and a “Notice of Levy/Seizure”.  They also attached a                 
          statement explaining that their reasons for disagreeing included            
          that they were never given the Tax Court hearing they requested             
          on March 18, 2000, and that they primarily disputed the                     
          disallowance in its entirety of $53,541 claimed in 1997 as cost             
          of good sold.                                                               
               In response to that portion of petitioners’ request which              
          related to the notice of intent to levy, respondent held a so-              
          called equivalency hearing and, on January 24, 2002, issued a               
          Decision Letter Concerning Equivalent Hearing Under Section 6320            
          and/or 6330 concluding that the subject levy was an appropriate             
          collection action.  In response to that portion of petitioners’             
          request which pertained to the notices of lien filing, respondent           
          held a “Collection Due Process” hearing and sent to petitioners a           
          Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Actions(s) Under              
          Section 6320 and/or 6330 dated February 28, 2002.  An attachment            
          to the notice of determination explained in relevant part as                
          follows:                                                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011