John Joseph Wingert - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          respondent mailed to petitioner a Notice of Intent To Levy and              
          Notice of Your Right to a Hearing relating to his tax years 1994-           
          96.  Petitioner timely requested a hearing.                                 
               On June 27, 2001, Keith B. Coleman (Coleman), respondent’s             
          Appeals officer, held a hearing relating to petitioner’s tax                
          years 1994-96.                                                              
               On July 13, 2001, respondent sent to petitioner a Notice of            
          Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320            
          and/or 6330 in which respondent determined to proceed with                  
          collection from petitioner of his tax liabilities for 1994-96.              
                                       OPINION                                        
          A.   Whether $5,243.13 of Petitioner’s Bankruptcy Estate Was Used           
               To Pay His Tax Liabilities for 1994-96                                 
               Petitioner contends that respondent’s determination to                 
          proceed with collection was an abuse of discretion because                  
          respondent improperly failed to recognize that $5,243.13 of his             
          bankruptcy estate was used to pay his 1994-96 taxes.  We                    
          disagree.                                                                   
               Petitioner introduced no credible evidence showing that                
          $5,243.13 of his bankruptcy estate was used to pay his 1994-96              
          taxes.  He testified that $5,243.13 of the proceeds from the                
          forced sale in bankruptcy of his house was used to pay his 1994-            
          96 taxes.  However, he conceded that respondent did not receive             
          the $5,243.13.  No documentary evidence suggests that any of the            
          bankruptcy estate was used to pay petitioner’s 1994-96 taxes.               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011