Raleigh L. and Angela M. J. Womack - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               For purposes of section 152(e), custody is determined by the           
          terms of the most recent custody decree, or, if none, by the                
          terms of a written separation agreement, in effect at the                   
          relevant time.  Sec. 1.152-4(b), Income Tax Regs.  In this case             
          there is neither a custody decree nor a written separation                  
          agreement that establishes custody of petitioner’s daughter for             
          purposes of section 152(e).  The parties agree that for purposes            
          of that section, the parent who had physical custody of                     
          petitioner’s daughter for a greater portion of 1998 is treated as           
          her custodial parent for that year.  See id.  However, the                  
          parties disagree over the year that petitioner’s daughter moved             
          from petitioner’s house to her mother’s house.  According to                
          petitioners, that event occurred in 2000; according to                      
          respondent, that event occurred in June 1998.                               
               Both petitioners testified credibly that, except for                   
          weekends and the incident that occurred in June of that year,               
          petitioner’s daughter lived with petitioner during the entire               
          1998 year.  Both described the living arrangements of                       
          petitioner’s daughter that followed petitioner’s divorce from Ms.           
          Caddle, and each referred to specific school events involving               
          petitioner’s daughter (e.g., the school year that she was on the            
          track team, the school year that she participated in JROTC, etc.)           
          that allowed them to determine a time frame with confidence.                
          Furthermore, petitioner explained that his daughter moved in with           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011