- 11 - notified by a State in accordance with section 464 of the Social Security Act and amounts owed to Federal agencies. Under section 6402(f): No court of the United States shall have jurisdiction to hear any action * * * brought to restrain or review a reduction authorized by subsection (c) [or] (d) * * *. No such reduction shall be subject to review by the Secretary in an administrative proceeding. No action brought against the United States to recover the amount of any such reduction shall be considered to be a suit for refund of tax. This subsection does not preclude any legal, equitable, or administrative action against the Federal agency or State to which the amount of such reduction was paid * * *. Petitioner's arguments that respondent's payments to the Department of Human Services and the Department of Agriculture were improper cannot be adjudicated in this case. Section 6402(f) forbids her to sue the Commissioner in any Court to recover the payments. The Tax Court has no jurisdiction to entertain any such suit. Section 6402(f) makes it clear that if petitioner has any claim to recover the payments, petitioner is required to make her claims directly against the recipient agencies.3 Issue 3: Respondent's Administrative Determinations Where, as in this case, the taxpayer's underlying tax liabilities are not in issue, we review the Commissioner's 3In making this observation, we do not wish to mislead petitioner into thinking we are holding she has valid claims against the agencies, even if the statutory time periods for making any such claims against the agencies have not already expired.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011