Jeffrey M. Young - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

               In addition, during the period of the appeal, you have                 
               incurred another liability and have failed to pay                      
               estimated taxes as required by law.  You have a long                   
               history of noncompliance and the appeal appears                        
               primarily for delay.                                                   
               This appeal is limited to the filed Notice of Federal                  
               Tax Lien.                                                              
               III. Balancing Efficient Collection and Intrusiveness                  
               Further delay would only result in increasing the                      
               liabilities as you have done during the appeal.  You                   
               are not eligible for an installment agreement or an                    
               offer in compromise due to your lack of compliance.                    
               Although you have had opportunities to comply, you have                
               failed to do so.  Therefore, it is recommended that the                
               actions by the Compliance [sic] be sustained, as                       
               appropriate, after considering all of the facts,                       
               circumstances and law.  The filed Notice of Federal Tax                
               Lien shall remain in full force and effect.                            
               Petitioner timely filed a petition with the Tax Court, in              
          which he alleged as error:  (1) He did not receive the statutory            
          notice and demand for payment; (2) the Appeals officer did not              
          obtain and produce the verification from the Secretary as                   
          provided in section 6330(c)(1); (3) the Appeals officer refused             
          to address challenges to the existence of petitioner’s underlying           
          tax liability; (4) the Appeals officer refused to allow Mr.                 
          Smigiel to represent petitioner at the Appeals hearing; and (5)             
          the notice of determination is invalid because the Appeals                  
          officer ended the hearing abruptly and did not allow petitioner             
          to “raise any issues as provided for in the law.”  Petitioner               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011