Zenobia Elisia Clary Ziegler - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
               Where, as here, the requesting spouse satisfies the                    
          threshold conditions set forth in Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.01,            
          Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.03, 2000-1 C.B. at 448, provides that            
          equitable relief may be granted under section 6015(f) if, taking            
          into account all facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to              
          hold the requesting spouse liable.  Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec.                
          4.03(1), 2000-1 C.B. at 448-449, lists the following six factors            
          that the Commissioner will consider as weighing in favor of                 
          granting relief for the liability (positive factors):  (1) The              
          requesting spouse is separated or divorced from the nonrequesting           
          spouse; (2) the requesting spouse would suffer economic hardship            
          if relief is denied; (3) the requesting spouse was abused by the            
          nonrequesting spouse; (4) the requesting spouse did not know or             
          have reason to know of the items giving rise to the deficiency;             
          (5) the nonrequesting spouse has a legal obligation pursuant to a           
          divorce decree or agreement to pay the liability; and (6) the               
          liability is solely attributable to the nonrequesting spouse.               
          Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.03(2), 2000-1 C.B. at 449, lists the             
          following six factors that the Commissioner will consider as                
          weighing against granting relief for the liability (negative                
          factors):  (1) The unpaid liability is attributable to the                  
          requesting spouse; (2) the requesting spouse knew or had reason             
          to know of the item giving rise to the deficiency; (3) the                  
          requesting spouse significantly benefited (beyond the normal                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011