Luis Acle, Jr. - Page 20

                                       - 19 -                                         
          Code.  The evidence petitioner did provide that shows certain               
          amounts of income that he received in the year in issue does not            
          correspond to the total amount reflected on his return.  Nor does           
          the amount of income reported on his return correspond to the               
          Forms 1099-MISC which petitioner was issued.  Despite being                 
          involved in transactions resulting in bank deposits of over                 
          $325,000, petitioner testified that “I also am mindful of the fact          
          that there’s probably a valid criticism that could be made of me            
          because I do not keep records that are precise, that can be added           
          up and totaled.”  We sustain respondent’s determination with                
          respect to the section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty, as                 
          modified by respondent’s concession concerning the amount of                
          unreported income.                                                          
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        under Rule 155.                               

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  

Last modified: May 25, 2011