- 19 - Code. The evidence petitioner did provide that shows certain amounts of income that he received in the year in issue does not correspond to the total amount reflected on his return. Nor does the amount of income reported on his return correspond to the Forms 1099-MISC which petitioner was issued. Despite being involved in transactions resulting in bank deposits of over $325,000, petitioner testified that “I also am mindful of the fact that there’s probably a valid criticism that could be made of me because I do not keep records that are precise, that can be added up and totaled.” We sustain respondent’s determination with respect to the section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty, as modified by respondent’s concession concerning the amount of unreported income. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Last modified: May 25, 2011