Mumtaz A. Ali - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          from property is taxed to the owner of the property at the time             
          the income is earned.  Helvering v. Horst, 311 U.S. 112, 116-117            
          (1940); Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 114 (1930); see United                 
          States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792, 793-794 (1931).  Tax cannot be             
          avoided through an anticipatory assignment of income.  Lucas v.             
          Earl, supra.                                                                
               A shareholder receives a constructive dividend to the extent           
          of the corporation's earnings and profits if the corporation pays           
          a personal expense of its shareholder or the shareholder uses               
          corporate property for a personal purpose.  Secs. 301(c), 316(a);           
          Falsetti v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 332, 356-357 (1985); Henry                
          Schwartz Corp. v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 728, 743-744 (1973).                
          Petitioner does not contend that SRC’s earnings and profits were            
          less than $84,000, and there is no evidence to suggest that the             
          earnings and profits requirement is not met.  A payment is a                
          constructive dividend if the corporation has conferred an                   
          economic benefit on the shareholder without expectation of                  
          repayment.  United States v. Smith, 418 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir.             
          1969); Truesdell v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 1280, 1295 (1987).                
          Petitioner economically benefited from SRC’s payment to Ali                 
          because those payments relieved him of the obligation to make               











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011