- 8 - from property is taxed to the owner of the property at the time the income is earned. Helvering v. Horst, 311 U.S. 112, 116-117 (1940); Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S. 111, 114 (1930); see United States v. Malcolm, 282 U.S. 792, 793-794 (1931). Tax cannot be avoided through an anticipatory assignment of income. Lucas v. Earl, supra. A shareholder receives a constructive dividend to the extent of the corporation's earnings and profits if the corporation pays a personal expense of its shareholder or the shareholder uses corporate property for a personal purpose. Secs. 301(c), 316(a); Falsetti v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 332, 356-357 (1985); Henry Schwartz Corp. v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 728, 743-744 (1973). Petitioner does not contend that SRC’s earnings and profits were less than $84,000, and there is no evidence to suggest that the earnings and profits requirement is not met. A payment is a constructive dividend if the corporation has conferred an economic benefit on the shareholder without expectation of repayment. United States v. Smith, 418 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir. 1969); Truesdell v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 1280, 1295 (1987). Petitioner economically benefited from SRC’s payment to Ali because those payments relieved him of the obligation to makePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011