James E. Anderson and Cheryl J. Latos - Page 44

                                       - 44 -                                         
          the fishing boat owner from subtracting operating expenses before           
          distributing the shares of proceeds.                                        
               b.  Our Prior Opinion in Anderson v. Commissioner                      
               Petitioners were the petitioners in Anderson v.                        
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-112, a case that concerned the                
          collection of petitioners’ outstanding self-employment tax                  
          liability for 1995 and income tax liabilities for 1996 through              
          1997 under section 6330.  The Court found the Appeals officer at            
          the section 6330 hearing did not abuse his discretion in refusing           
          to consider petitioners’ attempt to contest the underlying merits           
          of their 1995 self-employment tax liability.  The Court rejected            
          their argument that they were not liable for 1996 and 1997 income           
          tax because the fishing boat owners failed to withhold the tax.             
          The Court noted that section 3121(b)(20) does not obviate their             
          obligation to pay income tax.                                               
               In their answering brief, petitioners argue that Anderson              
          “repudiates the requirements of section 6330” and “disavows the             
          statutory scheme for the collection of employee taxes” because              
          the Court did not find abuse of discretion in the Commissioner’s            
          refusal to consider the merits of their 1995 self-employment tax            
          liability.                                                                  
               Petitioners’ argument is confusing and unpersuasive.                   
          Suffice it to say:  the proper forum for review of our decision             
          in Anderson was the Court of Appeals;  petitioners’ 1995 tax year           






Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011