Hamid and Eolina Bajramovic - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          1930).3  See Chiu v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-199;                     
          Haberthier v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-377.                            
               The parties stipulated to the fact that petitioners incurred           
          a moving expense of $2,074 for airline tickets in 1998.                     
          Therefore, petitioners are not entitled to deduct moving expenses           
          incurred during 1998 on their 1999 Federal income tax return.               
          Sec. 217(a); see Meadows v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 51 (1976);                
          Shaumyan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1981-543, affd. without                
          published opinion 697 F.2d 297 (2d Cir. 1982); Kincheloe v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1980-527.                                          
               Petitioners moved their family from the former Yugoslavia to           
          the United States in an attempt to start a new life.  Petitioners           
          undoubtedly faced great hardships in their move.  Keeping records           
          of their expenses and making sure they met the statutory                    
          requirements for deducting moving expenses were understandably              
          the farthest things from their minds.  However, the law is                  
          specific in the requirements that must be met in order to deduct            
          moving expenses, and we are unable to afford petitioners any                
          relief under the law.                                                       
               In reaching our holding herein, we have considered all                 
          arguments made, and, to the extent not mentioned above, we                  
          conclude that they are irrelevant or without merit.                         


               3  We need not decide whether the burden of proof shifts to            
               respondent under sec. 7491(a) because the facts are not in             
               dispute and the issue is one of law.                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011