Delbert L. and Margaret J. Baker - Page 39

                                       - 39 -                                         
               None of the above rulings have been revoked or modified,24             
          and the Commissioner has relied on these rulings in issuing                 
          private letter rulings regarding the deductible portion of                  
          monthly service fees.25  Indeed, the Commissioner in private                
          letter rulings has cited the above revenue rulings and sanctioned           
          use of the percentage method.  See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 86-30-            
          005 (Apr. 4, 1986), which states in relevant part:                          
                    The proper allocation of medical to total fees may                
               be determined by dividing all directly related medical                 
               expenses by total expenses.  To the extent that they                   
               can be substantiated and are allocable to medical care                 
               facilities, medically related expenses may include,                    

               24Although Rev. Rul. 76-481, supra, was clarified by Rev.              
          Rul. 93-72, 1993-2 C.B. 77, the clarification does not affect the           
          issue in the instant case.  It is unclear whether the                       
          Commissioner has considered the issue of the deductibility of               
          monthly service fees since 1993.  See Rev. Proc. 93-43, 1993-2              
          C.B. 544 (stating that no further rulings will be issued on the             
          issue of whether amounts paid for medical care extending                    
          substantially beyond the taxable year may be deducted under                 
          section 213); see also Rev. Proc. 99-3, 1999-1 C.B. 103                     
          (designating the issue stated in Rev. Proc. 93-43, supra as an              
          area under extensive study in which rulings or determination                
          letters will not be issued until the Service resolves the issue             
          through publication of a revenue ruling, revenue procedure,                 
          regulations, or otherwise).  We note that the monthly service               
          fees in this case relate to current medical care.                           
               25See, e.g., Priv. Ltr. Rul. 86-51-028 (Sept. 19, 1986);               
          Priv. Ltr. Rul. 86-41-037 (July 11, 1986); Priv. Ltr. Rul. 86-30-           
          005 (Apr. 4, 1986); Priv. Ltr. Rul. 82-13-102 (Dec. 30, 1981).              
          Private letter rulings are not regarded as precedent in this                
          Court and may not be relied on by the public.  Sec. 6110(j)(3);             
          Alumax, Inc. v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. at 163 n.12.  However,               
          private letter rulings may be cited to show the practice of the             
          Commissioner.  Rowan Cos., Inc. v. United States, 452 U.S. 247,             
          261 n.17 (1981); Hanover Bank v. Commissioner, 369 U.S. 672, 686-           
          687 (1962); Rauenhorst v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. at 170 n.8;                
          Estate of Cristofani v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 74, 84 n.5 (1991).            





Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011