Donald J. Barnes and Beverly A. Edwards, f.k.a. Beverly A. Barnes - Page 42

                                       - 42 -                                         
          petitioner had actual knowledge of the items giving rise to the             
          deficiencies in this case.  Consequently, respondent concedes               
          that petitioner is entitled to section 6015(c) relief.                      
               Section 6015(d) allocates a deficiency between a taxpayer              
          entitled to section 6015(c) relief and the other individual                 
          filing the joint return.  The general rule for the allocation of            
          the deficiency provides that:                                               
               The portion of any deficiency on a joint return                        
               allocated to an individual shall be the amount which                   
               bears the same ratio to such deficiency as the net                     
               amount of items taken into account in computing the                    
               deficiency and allocable to the individual under                       
               paragraph (3) bears to the net amount of all items                     
               taken into account in computing the deficiency.                        
          Sec. 6015(d)(1).  An item giving rise to a deficiency generally             
          is “allocated to individuals filing the return in the same manner           
          as it would have been allocated if the individuals had filed                
          separate returns for the taxable year.”  Sec. 6015(d)(3)(A).                
          However, items giving rise to a deficiency that are otherwise               
          allocable to one individual must be allocated to the other                  
          individual if she received a “tax benefit” from the items on the            
          joint return.  Sec. 6015(d)(3)(B).                                          
               Respondent argues that the items giving rise to the                    
          deficiencies in this case are allocable equally to petitioner and           
          Mr. Barnes.  Petitioner argues that the items are allocable                 
          solely to Mr. Barnes.  Because we have found that petitioner and            
          Mr. Barnes were both investors in the partnership, as discussed             






Page:  Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011