Angela Barriga, f.k.a. Angela Robledo - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               In 1995, petitioner and Robledo each filed returns for 1991            
          using the filing status of “married filing separate return”.                
          Petitioner’s return for 1991 was filed in March 1995 and reported           
          tax due of $38,406 and an underpayment of $32,625.  On                      
          November 9, 1995, respondent sent a notice of deficiency for 1991           
          to petitioner.  In or after October 1995, petitioner and Robledo            
          attempted to file an amended return for 1991 using the status of            
          “married filing joint return”.                                              
               In September 1995, Robledo filed separate returns for 1992             
          and 1993.  On October 12, 1995, joint Forms 1040X, Amended U.S.             
          Individual Income Tax Return, for 1992 and 1993 were filed.  The            
          amended returns claimed overpayments for 1992 and 1993 in the               
          amounts of $17,106 and $20,386, respectively.  Also on                      
          October 12, 1995, petitioner and Robledo filed a joint Form 1040            
          for 1994 claiming an overpayment of $4,675.  Each of the joint              
          returns reported wages paid to petitioner, Schedule C, Profit or            
          Loss From Business, income of Robledo, and rental income from               
          various properties owned by petitioner and Robledo.                         
               In or about 1999, petitioner, represented by a certified               
          public accountant, filed a request for section 6015 relief.                 
          During the Appeals process, petitioner was allowed partial relief           
          from joint and several liability under section 6015(c) for 1992,            
          1993, and 1994.  Respondent and petitioner’s representative                 
          together determined the appropriate allocation of the deficiency            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011