Timothy R. Becherer - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          6015(b).  Accordingly, petitioner is not entitled to relief                 
          pursuant to section 6015(b).                                                
          II. Relief Under Section 6015(c)                                            
               Section 6015(c) allows a taxpayer, who is eligible and so              
          elects, to limit his or her liability to the portion of a                   
          deficiency that is properly allocable to the taxpayer as provided           
          in section 6015(d).  Sec. 6015(c)(1).  Under section                        
          6015(d)(3)(A), generally, any item that gives rise to a                     
          deficiency on a joint return shall be allocated to the                      
          individuals filing the return in the same manner as it would have           
          been allocated if the individuals had filed separate returns for            
          the taxable year.  We consider whether petitioner’s claim for               
          relief is precluded by the “actual knowledge” provisions of                 
          section 6015(c)(3)(C).                                                      
               Relief under section 6015(c) is not available if the                   
          Commissioner proves by a preponderance of the evidence that                 
          petitioner had actual knowledge of “any item giving rise to a               
          deficiency.”  Culver v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 189, 194 (2001).             
          The knowledge standard for purposes of section 6015(c)(3)(C) is             
          “an actual and clear awareness (as opposed to reason to know) of            
          the existence of an item which gives rise to the deficiency (or             
          portion thereof).”  Cheshire v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. at 195.              
          In omitted income cases, the electing spouse “must have an actual           
          and clear awareness of the omitted income.”  Id. at 204 n.2.                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011