- 8 - 6015(b). Accordingly, petitioner is not entitled to relief pursuant to section 6015(b). II. Relief Under Section 6015(c) Section 6015(c) allows a taxpayer, who is eligible and so elects, to limit his or her liability to the portion of a deficiency that is properly allocable to the taxpayer as provided in section 6015(d). Sec. 6015(c)(1). Under section 6015(d)(3)(A), generally, any item that gives rise to a deficiency on a joint return shall be allocated to the individuals filing the return in the same manner as it would have been allocated if the individuals had filed separate returns for the taxable year. We consider whether petitioner’s claim for relief is precluded by the “actual knowledge” provisions of section 6015(c)(3)(C). Relief under section 6015(c) is not available if the Commissioner proves by a preponderance of the evidence that petitioner had actual knowledge of “any item giving rise to a deficiency.” Culver v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 189, 194 (2001). The knowledge standard for purposes of section 6015(c)(3)(C) is “an actual and clear awareness (as opposed to reason to know) of the existence of an item which gives rise to the deficiency (or portion thereof).” Cheshire v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. at 195. In omitted income cases, the electing spouse “must have an actual and clear awareness of the omitted income.” Id. at 204 n.2.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011