- 7 - barred because it was issued after expiration of the period of limitations for assessment of taxes. Respondent filed an Answer to Amended Petition on November 14, 2003, and, on November 26, 2003, filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment with supporting affidavits, seeking judgment that no settlement had been reached and that the notice of deficiency was issued within the period of limitations for the assessment of taxes and, therefore, was not barred. The parties filed objections to each others’ motions. Discussion A decision on a motion for partial summary judgment may be rendered if the pleadings and other materials in the record show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994). The Court has considered the pleadings and other materials in the record and concludes that there is no genuine issue of any material fact as it relates to the cross-motions of the parties and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. I. Settlement Petitioner contends that this case was settled by Mr. Leonard and Mr. Kaufman prior to the issuance of the notice of deficiency. Respondent contends that Mr. Kaufman lacked thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011