- 6 - reported deduction for real estate taxes. Petitioner's remaining deductions were disallowed due to lack of substantiation. 3. Accuracy-Related Penalty Respondent determined that petitioner is liable for an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for 2001. Discussion Generally, the Commissioner's determinations of unreported income in a notice of deficiency are presumed correct, and the taxpayer has the burden of proving that those determinations are erroneous. See Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). In certain circumstances, however, section 7491(a)(1) places the burden of proof on the Commissioner. Petitioner has not alleged or shown that section 7491 is applicable in this case. Petitioner did not call any witnesses or otherwise introduce any evidence to show error in respondent's determinations of her proper income tax liability. Petitioner, in fact, made no argument that respondent's adjustments are incorrect. She feels she was misled by her return preparer. The Court finds that petitioner has failed to meet her burden and, subject to a concession by respondent, sustains respondent's determination with respect to the 2000 and 2001 unreported income.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011