- 5 - $1,918 to New Star Insurance;7 and $6,000 to State Farm Insurance.8 Sometime in 1999, Ms. Thiellesen filed a petition with the Circuit Court seeking enforcement of petitioner’s $75 weekly child support obligation. On February 15, 2000, the Circuit Court issued an Opinion and Order (order) holding that the parties’ private agreement was void and unenforceable because parents may not bargain away a child’s right to support. The Circuit Court was not persuaded that the noncash items benefited Nicole as to constitute child support, but held that the checks totaling $6,892 were tantamount to direct payments of child support, which would be credited toward petitioner’s outstanding child support obligation. The Circuit Court calculated arrearages against petitioner and then reinstated petitioner’s child support obligation. At trial, petitioner testified that he discussed with his attorney about suing Ms. Thiellesen for restitution in the amount of $34,352, which was calculated as follows: The total amount of payments made pursuant to the private agreement less the amount determined by the Circuit Court as child support; i.e., $41,244 - $6,892 = $34,352. Petitioner’s attorney, however, “felt that 7 New Star Insurance provided the insurance coverage for the truck. Petitioner paid the insurance as it came due. 8 Petitioner paid for an investment fund and a universal life policy for Nicole.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011