Louis Bonner, Jr. and Celeste Bonner - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

               Respondent determined a deficiency of $2,508 in petitioners'           
          Federal income tax for 1999.                                                
               The sole issue for decision is whether Louis Bonner, Jr.               
          (petitioner) received payments during 1999 that constitute gross            
          income under section 61(a)(1) as compensation for services                  
          rendered.                                                                   
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts, with the              
          exhibits annexed thereto, are so found and are incorporated                 
          herein by reference.  Petitioners, husband and wife, were                   
          residents of Shreveport, Louisiana, at the time the petition was            
          filed.                                                                      
               Petitioner is a cabinet maker, building such things as                 
          kitchen cabinets, bookcases, and shelves.  He has been engaged in           
          this kind of work for approximately 30 years.  Petitioner Celeste           
          Bonner was employed by Century Telephone Co. during the year in             
          question in the collections department.  At trial, she was                  
          employed by Alltell Telephone Co.                                           
               Petitioners filed a joint Federal income tax return for 1999           
          on which they reported wage and salary income of $37,314, taxable           
          interest income of $13, and taxable pension income of $755, all             
          of which totaled $38,082.  In their tax computation, petitioners            
          included the 10-percent tax under section 72(t) for early                   
          distributions from a qualified plan in the amount of $76.                   
          Respondent determined that petitioners failed to include on their           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011