Stephen James Caputi - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          than half of the dependent’s support and is unconstitutional.  An           
          irrebuttable presumption may be defined as a presumption                    
          “incapable of being overcome by proof of the most positive                  
          character.”  Heiner v. Donnan, 285 U.S. 312, 324 (1932).                    
          Petitioner argues that section 152(e) denies him equal protection           
          in disallowing the dependency exemption deduction for one of his            
          children because Ms. Sirkis and he have an even number of                   
          children for whom he pays child support.                                    
          With regard to Federal statutes, the Due Process Clause of                  
          the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States                
          embraces the principles of the Equal Protection Clause of the               
          Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.              
          Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361, 364-365 n.4 (1974); Shapiro v.            
          Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 641-642 (1969).  In Regan v. Taxation               
          with Representation, 461 U.S. 540, 547 (1983), the Supreme Court            
          noted:                                                                      
               Generally, statutory classifications are valid if they bear            
               a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose.              
               Statutes are subjected to a higher level of scrutiny if they           
               interfere with the exercise of a fundamental right, such as            
               freedom of speech, or employ a suspect classification, such            
               as race.  Legislatures have especially broad latitude in               
               creating classifications and distinctions in tax statutes.             
               * * * [Citation omitted.]                                              
               No fundamental right or suspect classification is involved             
          here.  Under the rational basis standard, a provision does not              
          violate equal protection “if any state of facts rationally                  
          justifying it is demonstrated to or perceived by the courts.”               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011