- 8 - to as the self-rental rule or the recharacterization rule),6 and provides: (f)(6) Property rented to a nonpassive activity. An amount of the taxpayer’s gross rental activity income for the taxable year from an item of property equal to the net rental activity income for the year from that item of property is treated as not from a passive activity if the property–- (i) Is rented for use in a trade or business activity * * * in which the taxpayer materially participates * * *.[7] Petitioners concede that they “materially participated” in the conduct of both the steel company and the restaurant during 1999 and 2000, and they do not contend that section 1.469- 2(f)(6), Income Tax Regs., is either invalid or inapplicable. Petitioners, however, contend that computation of passive activity loss requires the netting of income and loss from all items of rental property grouped within the section 469 passive activity and that only after such a computation does section 6To illustrate the self-rental rule, suppose taxpayer A owns a property and all outstanding stock of B Corp. A materially participates in the operations of B Corp., which generates $100 of income and has $50 of operating expenses in year 1. In year 1, A enters a lease agreement with B Corp. requiring B Corp. to pay $50 of annual rent to A for A’s property. B Corp. uses the property in year 1 as its headquarters. If B Corp. were to pay its $50 net income to A in the form of salary, A would have $50 of income not from a passive activity. However, because the $50 of net income is paid to A in the form of rent, it is per se passive income pursuant to sec. 469(c)(2). Sec. 1.469-2(f)(6), Income Tax Regs., recharacterizes the $50 of net rental income as not from a passive activity. 7As discussed below, sec. 1.469-2(f)(6), Income Tax Regs., is authorized by sec. 469(l)(2).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011