- 5 -
operating under any privelege [sic] or engaging in any
activity which generates revenue taxable income.
Any tax on our property, the fruits of our labor,
must fall within the context of the apportionment
clauses of the United States Constituion [sic].
Furthermore, whereas we possess other
constitutionally protected rights, you lack any
authority to require us to testify before you, to
deliver to you any of our property or to provide you
with any information.
We do not wish to voluntarily confer jurisdiction
over us.
In a letter dated January 1, 1992, petitioner and his wife
asserted the following:
We are writing to inform you that the meeting
arranged for us on January 3, 1992 is cancelled.
As stated in our previous letter to you, we have
no tax liability to the United States or the Internal
Revenue Service; perhaps you do not understand our
status. Furthermore, we have opened no accounts with
respect to Title 26.
We remind you that you lack any authority to
“summons” us or to “seize” any of our property (see
Hale v. Henkel).
We have not voluntarily assesed [sic] ourselves
(Flora v. U.S.) nor opened any accounts with you nor
entered into any contractual agreement with you or the
United States.
Our status is such that we are not subject to the
provisions of Title 26.
Please provide proof of any such voluntary
assesment [sic] or the existance [sic] of any
“accounts” or that you have any proper jurisdiction
over us before bothering us again.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011